IsaiahC

Reformed Theology. TULIP. Life in Singapore. Photography. Tech. Mac. Humor. Social Media. Liverpool Football Club. 
Filed under

Church

 

Five Stalks of Tulips {5 October 2009}

Filed under  //   Church   Gospel   Roman Catholicism   Scripture   Sola Scriptura  

Comments [0]

Just a Random Thought on the Chinese Words for Church

Was waiting for the bus to return to the office this afternoon when two old ladies sitting just a foot or so away were discussing how they could get to a certain destination. They were conversing in Mandarin, but for the sake of readers who do not understand the language, I've taken the liberty of translating much of the conversation into English, except for the keywords.

Old lady #1: You know, it's near that 教堂 (pronounced "jiao tang", which is Mandarin for "church")? We just have to alight there.

Old lady #2: That 教堂?

Old lady #1: Yes, that 教堂...

They must have repeated the words "教堂" half a dozen times or more, and the words soon echoed in my brain.

教堂... 教堂... a hall where teaching takes place.

For those who speak and write Chinese: yes, although the church is known as 基督教堂 (pronounced "ji du jiao tang") which, translated directly, means "Christianity (基督教) Hall (堂)", people usually refer to churches as just 教堂.

Funny how when we hear people mention churches it means a hall for teaching (and learning), yet most churches today don't teach God's Word...

Just saying.

Filed under  //   Chinese   Church   Learning   Teaching  

Comments [0]

Popularity Or the Gospel?

If the church's stated aim is to present herself as being so attractive and beneficial to the City of Man that unbelievers simply cannot help but jump on the holy bandwagon, not only should we remove the "I" (irresistible grace) from Calvinism's well-known acrostic (and the "T" [total depravity] for that matter), but we should be tempted to be ashamed of the meager ministry and methods of the church.

Excerpt from Jason Stellman's new book Dual Citizens, via Ligonier Ministries Blog. Read the full article here.

Filed under  //   Calvinism   Church   Gospel   Lignoier Ministries   Popularity   TULIP  

Comments [0]

Mark Kielar Defining Biblical Worship

What is Biblical Worship? Does the Bible give us any guide for how to conduct a worship service? Does the Bible even speak of a worship service? Here, Mark Kielar explains some of these things in the first week of his sermon series on Biblical worship called "Sing Unto the Lord".

HT: Lane Chaplin

Filed under  //   Church   Mark Kielar   Worship  

Comments [0]

In Essentials Unity, In Non-Essentials Liberty, In All Things Charity

by Mark E. Ross

Philip Schaff, the distinguished nineteenth century church historian, calls the saying in our title "the watchword of Christian peacemakers" (History of the Christian Church, Vol. 7, p. 650). Often attributed to great theologians such as Augustine, it comes from an otherwise undistinguished German Lutheran theologian of the early seventeenth century, Rupertus Meldenius. The phrase occurs in a tract on Christian unity written (c. 1627) during the Thirty Years War (1618-1648), a bloody time in European history in which religious tensions played a significant role. The saying has found great favor among subsequent writers such as Richard Baxter, and has since been adopted as a motto by the Moravian Church of North America and the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. Might it serve us well as a motto for every church and for every denomination today?  

Unity

Those who are united by faith in Christ are thereby united to one another in the church, the body of Christ. We call this union the communion of saints. It is a mysterious thing, and to understand it properly we will need to see it both in its "now" and "not yet" aspects. Because it is a union created by Christ in baptizing us all by one Spirit into his body, the church (I Cor. 12:12-13), it is true of all Christians now, a fait accompli.  But the manifestation of that unity is not always apparent. Christians can display ugly divisions between one another, as at the church of Corinth (I Cor. 1:10-17). Their disunity could be seen in the public square as members sued one another before the ungodly in civic courts (I Cor. 6:1-8). Even the Lord's Supper was not sufficient to bring them together in love and unity (I Cor. 11:17-34). Manifesting fully the unity in Christ which already is given to us belongs to the "not yet" perfection of the faith that will come at our glorification. With deep longing our Lord prayed for our unity, knowing that on it rests our own blessing and the credibility of the church's witness for Christ (John 17:20-23).

Liberty

Tensions arising from diversity of belief and practice among Christians are already apparent in the pages of the New Testament and remain with us today. There was apparently a thriving vegetarian faction within the church at Rome (Rom. 14).  "One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables" (v. 2). There was also a difference among them about whether certain days were to be honored (v. 5). How do we live with such differences among us?  Paul says, "As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions" (v. 1). Such a person is to be welcomed, says Paul, and not just welcomed for the purpose of quarreling with him over his views. Love for such a person, weak in faith though he is, must continue. 

In that love, we must extend liberty to each person to hold fast to his own conscience on what Christ has commanded (Rom. 14:5); but how far can that liberty be extended? Apparently, it would extend far enough to include vegetarians and those who maintained that Christians should continue to honor the Jewish feast days. But would it also include baptists receiving into church membership people with paedobaptist convictions, or paedobaptists receiving members with baptist convictions? Should believers who hold to a corporeal presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper admit to the table those who believe the real presence of Christ in the Supper is spiritual and not corporeal? After two thousand years of church history Christians are still divided on many key doctrinal issues, even on the very signs of our unity in Christ, baptism and the Lord's Supper. How then can we be one in Christ and demonstrate the communion of saints?  It would seem that either we must ignore our doctrinal differences and treat them as inconsequential, or we must remain permanently divided and in opposition to one another until Christ returns.  Is there not a more excellent way (I Cor. 12:31)?

Charity

Love for Christ must include a love for his truth, and so we can never treat as inconsequential anything that Christ has commanded his church. Only those who abide in Jesus' word are truly his disciples (John 8:31), and disciples are to be taught to obey all that he has commanded (Matt. 28:19). So the route which we might call doctrinal minimalism is not open to us. We cannot simply reduce the number of doctrines to be taught and believed to what we can all accept as important and ignore the rest. Movement in that direction always seems to lose its brakes and eventually nothing distinctive of Christianity remains. 

But neither can we lock ourselves up in very small groups with maximal agreement on doctrine and morals, and then separate from others and refuse to acknowledge as Christians those who do not embrace all our distinctives. The multiplication of small groups who pride themselves on purity but who denounce and despise those who fall short of that standard does nothing to express the truth of "the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church" for which Christ died. The love we must have for all of Christ's disciples has no expression in this path. Where, then, is the more excellent way?

As we have observed above, the unity which we have is by the Spirit of Christ baptizing us into Christ and into his body, the church (I Cor. 12:12-13). Our expression of that unity must therefore be a unity of the truth "as it is in Jesus" (Eph. 4:21). Ultimately that will be all the truth that is in Jesus, but our unity with Jesus does not wait until that perfection is achieved. Salvation comes to us by faith in Christ, so there must be a defining core of truth which is ours in faith, sufficient to unite us to Christ even if not yet complete in all its detail. Defining this core precisely might prove to be as difficult as living out the whole truth faithfully, but it will surely include that God the Creator of heaven and earth, against whom we have all sinned, was in Christ, reconciling to himself all who believe in him, not counting their sins against them, but forgiving them through the redemption that is found in the sinless life and atoning death of Christ and received by faith alone, calling for obedience to Christ as Lord under the authority of his Word in the Holy Scriptures. Where Christ is truly preached, there is the Gospel; and where the Gospel is truly believed, there is the church.  

Yet as we have seen, the church which is in Jesus is a diverse church. This diversity among Christians is due to our lack of conformity to Christ. He has chosen to sanctify us gradually in this world. As the progress we make in sanctification varies both in doctrine and in practice, there will always be a need in this world for those who are united in Christ to live in love with one another while dealing with differences. Sometimes these differences result in the formation of different churches and denominations, in order to maintain a good conscience toward God. But such divisions need not be a defeat of unity among us, so long as we do not permit them to destroy our love and welcome for one another in Christ. Such divisions are of practical necessity anyway, for not all Christians in the world can meet together at the same time in the same place.

Many distinct gatherings of Christians spread throughout the world can actually serve the purposes of God, by sprinkling us among the lost to shine the light of Christ. Our multiple groupings can also serve us well, encouraging us to be faithful to what we believe Christ has taught us, bringing us together with those with whom we can cooperate most fully. But if we allow our divisions to become breaches of love and occasions for pride and rivalry, then we will have failed in our calling, and our witness for Christ will be marred.

The saying of Rupertus Meldenius strikes the right balance. It calls for unity on the essential things, the core of truth in our union with Christ. In non-essentials (not the unimportant, but those things which if lacking do not prevent our union with Christ), it calls for liberty so that all might follow their conscience under the Word and Spirit. In all things, however, there must be love ('charity' from the Latin caritas, 'love'), "which binds everything together in perfect harmony" (Col. 3:14).

May the God who gives endurance and encouragement give you a spirit of unity among yourselves as you follow Christ Jesus, so that with one heart and mouth you may glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God (Rom. 15:5-7).

HT: Ligonier Ministries

Filed under  //   Church  

Comments [0]

Long Before Luther

by Nathan Busenitz

The Protestant doctrine of sola fide is, of course, established in the teaching of the New Testament. Our authority in all matters is solely found in the Scriptures (hence, the Reformation principle of sola scriptura). Thus, we are convinced that salvation is by grace alone through faith alone because that is precisely what the Bible teaches.

But is there a witness to the great Reformed principle of sola fide in early church history? OR was Martin Luther the first to introduce the idea in the early 1500s (as many Roman Catholics claim)?

In order to answer those questions, we have listed a twenty-one quotes from early Christian leaders below. Such a list (though not authoritative) is nonetheless confirming for those who embrace a Reformed soteriology.

1. Clement of Rome (c. 30–100): And we [Christians], too, being called by His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified by ourselves, nor by our own wisdom, or understanding, or godliness, or works which we have wrought in holiness of heart; but by that faith through which, from the beginning, Almighty God has justified all men; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

2. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 50–115): His cross, and his death, and his resurrection, and the faith which is through him, are my unpolluted muniments [legal titles]; and in these, through your prayers, I am willing to be justified.

3. Polycarp (c. 69–155): I know that through grace you are saved, not of works, but by the will of God, through Jesus Christ.

4. Justin Martyr (d. 165): No longer by the blood of goats and of sheep, or by the ashes of a heifer . . . are sins purged, but by faith, through the blood of Christ and his death, who died on this very account.

5. Didymus the Blind (c. 313-398): This does not mean that works can be put before faith, because a person is saved by grace, not by works but by faith.

6. Hilary of Poitiers (c 315-67): Wages cannot be considered as a gift, because they are due to work, but God has given free grace to all men by the justification of faith.

7. Athanasius (295–375): By surrendering to death the body which He [Jesus Christ] had taken, as an offering and sacrifice free from every stain, He immediately abolished death for His human brothers by the offering of the equivalent. For naturally, since the Logos of God was above all, when He offered His own temple and bodily instrument as a substitute for the life of all, He fulfilled by death all that was required.

8. Basil of Caesarea (329-379): Let him who boasts boast in the Lord, that Christ has been made by God for us righteousness, wisdom, justification, redemption. This is perfect and pure boasting in God, when one is not proud on account of his own righteousness but knows that he is indeed unworthy of the true righteousness and is (or has been) justified solely by faith in Christ.

9. Ambrose (339–97): Therefore let no one boast of his works, because no one can be justified by his works; but he who is just receives it as a gift, because he is justified by the washing of regeneration. It is faith, therefore, which delivers us by the blood of Christ, because blessed is he whose sins are forgiven, and to whom pardon is granted.

10. Jerome (347-420) on Romans 10:3: God justifies by faith alone.

11. Jerome (again): He who with all his spirit has placed his faith in Christ, even if he die in sin, shall by his faith live forever.

12. Chrysostom (349–407): But what is the “law of faith?” It is, being saved by grace. Here he shows God’s power, in that He has not only saved, but has even justified, and led them to boasting, and this too without needing works, but looking for faith only.

13. Chrysostom (again): For Scripture says that faith has saved us. Put better: Since God willed it, faith has saved us. Now in what case, tell me, does faith save without itself doing anything at all? Faith’s workings themselves are a gift of God, lest anyone should boast. What then is Paul saying? Not that God has forbidden works but that he has forbidden us to be justified by works. No one, Paul says, is justified by works, precisely in order that the grace and benevolence of God may become apparent.

14. Augustine (354-430): If Abraham was not justified by works, how was he justified? . . .  Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness (Rom. 4:3; Gen. 15:6). Abraham, then, was justified by faith. Paul and James do not contradict each other: good works follow justification.

15. Augustine (again): When someone believes in him who justifies the impious, that faith is reckoned as justice to the believer, as David too declares that person blessed whom God has accepted and endowed with righteousness, independently of any righteous actions (Rom 4:5-6). What righteousness is this? The righteousness of faith, preceded by no good works, but with good works as its consequence.

16. Ambrosiaster (c. 366-384): God has decreed that a person who believes in Christ can be saved without works. By faith alone he receives the forgiveness of sins.

17. Ambrosiaster (again), on Rom. 3:24: They are justified freely because they have not done anything nor given anything in return, but by faith alone they have been made holy by the gift of God.

18. Ambrosiaster (again), on Rom. 3:27: Paul tells those who live under the law that they have no reason to boast basing themselves on the law and claiming to be of the race of Abraham, seeing that no one is justified before God except by faith.

19. Cyril of Alexandria (412-444): For we are justified by faith, not by works of the law, as Scripture says (Gal. 2:16). By faith in whom, then, are we justified? Is it not in him who suffered death according to the flesh for our sake? Is it not in one Lord Jesus Christ.

20. Cyril of Alexandria (again): For truly the compassion from beside the Father is Christ, as he takes away the sins, dismisses the charges and justifies by faith, and recovers the lost and makes [them] stronger than death. . . . For by him and in him we have known the Father, and we have become rich in the justification by faith.

21. Fulgentius, bishop of Ruspe (c. 467-532) commenting on Eph. 2:8: The blessed Paul argues that we are saved by faith, which he declares to be not from us but a gift from God. Thus there cannot possibly be true salvation where there is no true faith, and, since this faith is divinely enabled, it is without doubt bestowed by his free generosity.

HT: Pulpit Magazine.

Filed under  //   Church   History   Reformed   Theology  

Comments [0]